Censorship extends to IM, Email and the Web ?

Read this: http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2010/07/new-massachusetts-law-extends-censorship-to-im-e-mail-web.ars


Oh my, what are the politicians thinking in the 'Land of the Free' ? Imagine you are trying to chat with someone and you have to worry whether you chat conversations would suddenly be dropped or your private emails would be inspected by someone and never be delivered successfully ?


I think the 'Land of the Free' have become so incompetent and locked down to the point, what's it's difference between itself and North Korea , except that North Korea isn't as advanced technologically.


It's time we exercise our freedom, switch on the Tor network, encrypt using AES 256, SSH, all websites and search engines switch from HTTP to HTTPS, secure our personal and enterprise assets, encrypt all our IM, emails, logs...etc.


Let's not allow others to control us and our rights and freedom.


Power to the People !


Out for now... brb soon...

What MSN and other chats really need

Here's a list of what I thought IMs (Instant Messenger e.g. MSN, Google Talk, Yahoo Messenger...) could add into their protocols.

1. Make their protocols modular like XMPP

Most protocols can be said to be modular to a small degree but the XMPP protocol (Google Talk is XMPP) is by far the most modular protocol I have seen.

2. Security.

I have done testing of chat security and as like many people who have used Wireshark / Ethereal to capture chat conversations, I could see my conversations and logins in full plain view. The amount of eavesdropping on conversation and breach of privacy is escalating and it's time we need to protect ourselves. Pidgin IM have an RSA encryption plugin but you need another Pidgin IM with RSA plugin installed and enabled. Why not a universal standard cross - chat , OS and programming language platform security protocol to protect us using IMs ?

3. Proper file transfer

Most IMs file transfer sucks big time. Slow and prone to dropping... especially MSN's. There's a need for a proper file transfer. Maybe MSN might want to build in a proper FTP function that supports the standard FTP... not MSN's own file transfer. Use the standards. Don't try to reinvent the wheel and fail horribly. Current chat file transfers are can be summarized in one word: UGLY !

4. Universal emoticon symbols

Some messengers support certain symbols for certain emoticons. I think there is a need for a universal standardized emoticon and symbol set. Maybe someone could propose that to some world standards body like ISO ?

5. OPENNESS of APIs.

Most messengers are trying to open up their APIs and that's good but I noticed that more work and effort is needed.

for now, this is a list of what most IMs need to look into.