Thursday, July 15, 2010

Apple Cheats By Tweaking iOS signal bar

We have all heard of Apple's claims that the signal bar is the main course of the supposed lost of signal strength rather then how a person grips and holds the phone.


Read:
I doubt I need to pull much sources and paste them here... everyone knows that Apple's being cheating using that supposed signal bar software fix to get away with the problems.


Apple better be honest and get the antenna fixed rather then using 'illusions' like tweaking the codes for the signal bar software.


People's trust of Apple products and integrity would drop unless Apple admits the antenna problem and that the tweaking of the signal bar software does not fix anything.

Evil Softwares: Droid X

I would kick off a new commentary called Evil Softwares where softwares that are 'EVIL' and restricts the 'FREEDOM' would be listed and given a bad 'dressing down' here.


The first victim we have here is... 'Droid X' by Motorola. 


Read: 
I don't remember Android being released as a closed source software. Android is released as GPL v2 and Apache v2.0 license ! Now what gives Motorola the rights to remove the freedom of user's mod-ing ? 


At most it's the lost of warranty but if Motorola is going to 'self-destruct' mods besides users losing warranties for mod-ing, then why bother use Android, which is a 'FREE' (as in FSF definition of freedom) software. Go use Win 7 mobile or something non-FREE if you want to lock people down so much.


Isn't that simply the misusing of the name of Android ? Android's reputation of 'FREE' HAS BEEN STAINED BY MOTOROLA.

so hated...

Wednesday, July 14, 2010

Censorship extends to IM, Email and the Web ?

Read this: http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2010/07/new-massachusetts-law-extends-censorship-to-im-e-mail-web.ars


Oh my, what are the politicians thinking in the 'Land of the Free' ? Imagine you are trying to chat with someone and you have to worry whether you chat conversations would suddenly be dropped or your private emails would be inspected by someone and never be delivered successfully ?


I think the 'Land of the Free' have become so incompetent and locked down to the point, what's it's difference between itself and North Korea , except that North Korea isn't as advanced technologically.


It's time we exercise our freedom, switch on the Tor network, encrypt using AES 256, SSH, all websites and search engines switch from HTTP to HTTPS, secure our personal and enterprise assets, encrypt all our IM, emails, logs...etc.


Let's not allow others to control us and our rights and freedom.


Power to the People !


Out for now... brb soon...

Saturday, July 3, 2010

Google Me to become Facebook's alt.

Read following links:

If Google Me wants to be a replacement to take over Facebook, it's gonna be a uphill battle. In my opinion, Google have to do the following to win over fans of Facebook:
  1. Respect privacy of others and provide easy to use and very powerful privacy controls for users.
  2. Convince Facebook users why Facebook is not better than Google Me.
  3. Transparency in how security breaches are handled.
  4. Better apps and APIs.
  5. Open platform.

Saturday, June 19, 2010

What MSN and other chats really need

Here's a list of what I thought IMs (Instant Messenger e.g. MSN, Google Talk, Yahoo Messenger...) could add into their protocols.

1. Make their protocols modular like XMPP

Most protocols can be said to be modular to a small degree but the XMPP protocol (Google Talk is XMPP) is by far the most modular protocol I have seen.

2. Security.

I have done testing of chat security and as like many people who have used Wireshark / Ethereal to capture chat conversations, I could see my conversations and logins in full plain view. The amount of eavesdropping on conversation and breach of privacy is escalating and it's time we need to protect ourselves. Pidgin IM have an RSA encryption plugin but you need another Pidgin IM with RSA plugin installed and enabled. Why not a universal standard cross - chat , OS and programming language platform security protocol to protect us using IMs ?

3. Proper file transfer

Most IMs file transfer sucks big time. Slow and prone to dropping... especially MSN's. There's a need for a proper file transfer. Maybe MSN might want to build in a proper FTP function that supports the standard FTP... not MSN's own file transfer. Use the standards. Don't try to reinvent the wheel and fail horribly. Current chat file transfers are can be summarized in one word: UGLY !

4. Universal emoticon symbols

Some messengers support certain symbols for certain emoticons. I think there is a need for a universal standardized emoticon and symbol set. Maybe someone could propose that to some world standards body like ISO ?

5. OPENNESS of APIs.

Most messengers are trying to open up their APIs and that's good but I noticed that more work and effort is needed.

for now, this is a list of what most IMs need to look into.

Friday, June 18, 2010

GoogleCL, what it's for ?

Google have introduced a Linux command line package of tools to access it's web services.

Go to: http://code.google.com/p/googlecl/

Maybe Google thought that Linux users are 'geeks' and therefore 'geeks' like terminals and command lines ? I have no idea what Google was thinking when they released GoogleCL.

My personal opinion is they are doing something useless. It's far more efficient to use a browser or Google Apps with all the GUI to access the Google Web Services then a long string of command line command.

Imagine you want to post a blog using GoogleCL which would be the bottom command:

google blogger post --title "GoogleCL, what it's for ?" "Google have introduced a Linux command line package of tools to access it's web services.


Go to: ...

Maybe Google thought that Linux users are 'geeks' and therefore 'geeks' like terminals and command lines ? I have no idea what Google was thinking when they released GoogleCL. 

My personal opinion is they are doing something useless. It's far more efficient to use a browser or Google Apps with all the GUI to access the Google Web Services then a long string of command line command.

Imagine you want to post a blog using GoogleCL which would be the bottom command:..."
Wow, that would be a hell of a long command string to just make a blogging post to blogger !

This is yet another product where Google is making, not knowing what to do... and having bad imaginations and ideas besides wasting precious software development time and developers on unnecessary things and bad product ideas.

They could have redirected these quality time and developer resources to more useful development like the WebM project, Chrome browser...etc.

I think this is one of the bad decisions and uncreative things Google have created.

Saturday, June 5, 2010

Google's 2 OSes

Google have made two different OSes so far. One of them is the infamous Android and the other is the still in development Chrome OS. Both OSes are based on Linux.


Why don't Google reuse the already well-liked and infamous Android OS and modify it for desktop and netbook usage rather then reinventing the wheel, spawning the Chrome OS ? If Google really wanted Android OS to have the Chrome browser-like feel which Chrome OS is using, they could simply write some sort of layer over Android like what other Android mods have done (customizing their Android mods).


By choosing just Android to work with and having a desktop / netbook Chrome-like feel mod, all they need to do is focus on one single OS and that's all they need. 


Splitting attention between two OSes can sap a lot of resources and attention. Logically speaking, Chrome OS would have a high possibility of being discarded sooner or later because the amount of attention and resource being sapped from maintaining two OSes is quite a lot, even for a huge company like Google.


Google, please think twice. It's not late to give up on Chrome OS and create a mod for Android to run a Chrome-like desktop/netbook OS.